Sistem Monitoring dan Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30595/pspfs.v6i.862Keywords:
Monitoring, Evaluation, Lecturer Performance, Multi Factor Evaluation Process, MFEPAbstract
Monitoring and evaluating the performance of lecturers at the Faculty of Engineering, Tamansiswa Bachelor Wiyata University, the system that has been running has experienced many problems with the increasing number of active students and limited human resources. The evaluation of the learning questionnaire is filled out through the Google Form and the lecturer's data performance is processed using software such as Microsoft Office Excel or the like. In this study the aim was to produce a system that could support learning monitoring and evaluation activities in measuring the level of lecturer performance. The system is needed to process data as a tool to input and report on monitoring and evaluating lecturer performance. The method applied is the Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) using four criteria, namely pedagogic, professional, personality and social competence. Based on the results of the tests that have been carried out, the lecturer performance monitoring and evaluation system can provide decisions in the form of lecturer performance levels. The system can be used at several user levels, namely faculty academics, heads of study programs and Gugus Mutu Prodi (GMP) in assessing or measuring lecturer performance.
References
L. P. Mutu, Standar Monitoring dan Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Yogyakarta, 2017.
M. Sanwasih and D. S. Adhuri, “Prototipe Monitoring Dan Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen Untuk Menunjang Kegiatan Tridharma Perguruan Tinggi ( Studi Kasus Universitas Islam Attahiriyah ),” pp. 13–18, 2014.
Y. Anggela Oktaviana, I. P. Satwika, and N. W. Utami, “Perancangan Sistem Informasi Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen Berbasis Website (Studi Kasus Stmik Primakara),” J. Krisnadana, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2022.
F. A. Setyaningsih and S. Rahmayuda, “JEPIN (Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika) Sistem Informasi Evaluasi Kualitas Kinerja Dosen dalam Menentukan Key Performance Indicator Ilhamsyah #1 , Fatma Agus Setyaningsih #2 , Syahru Rahmayuda #3,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 132–138, 2019.
E. Y. Sari, T. Rahmawati, and ..., “Designing Learning Monitoring snd Evaluation Management Systems for Lecturer Performance in Informatics Study Program:(Case Study: Universitas Sarjanawiyata …,” J. Inf. …, vol. 5, no. 2, 2022.
R. S. Ismunu, A. S. Purnomo, R. Yunita, and S. Subardjo, “Dalam Menyusun Skripsi Menggunakan Metode Multi Factor,” pp. 978–979, 2020.
T. Limbong, J. Simarmata, M. Rofendi Manalu, A. Rikki, and D. M. Rajagukguk, “Implementation of Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) in Assessment of Employee Performance Achievement,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1573, no. 1, 2020.
H. Usman, S. Sriyanto, A. Buchori, A. Handayani, and P. T. Nguyen, “Implementation multi factor evaluation process (MFEP) decision support system for choosing the best elementary school teacher,” Int. J. Control Autom., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 97–102, 2020.
M. Ikhlas, “Penerapan Metode Mfep (Multifactor Evaluation Process) Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Pemilihan Bibit Kelapa Sawit Terbaik,” J. Sains dan Teknol. J. Keilmuan dan Apl. Teknol. Ind., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 16, 2019.
Kusrini, Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, I. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2007.
L. Latif, M. Jamil, and A. Abbas, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Teori dan Implementasinya. Yogyakarta: Deepublish,
I. Afrianty and R. Umbara, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) Menentukan Kelayakan Calon Penerima Zakat Menerapkan Multi- Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP),” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Informasi, Komun. dan Ind. 8, no. November, pp. 87–94, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Proceedings Series on Physical & Formal Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
