Variation of b Value for Axial DWI Prostate MR Imaging in Cancer: Which b Value is Optimal?

Authors

  • Nurul Dwi Agustina Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Fani Susanto Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Hernastiti Sedya Utami Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Lujeng Agus Setiarso RSUD dr. R. Goeteng Taroenadibrata Purbalingga
  • Muhammad Faisal Prince of Songkla University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/pshms.v5i.965

Keywords:

DWI, MRI Prostat, Cancer, b value

Abstract

Background: Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) is a technique that visualizes the movement of water molecules from areas of higher to lower concentration. In DWI sequences, the b-value parameter affects the signal intensity in the images. The objective of this study is to describe the differences in anatomical image information between b-value variations of 1500s/mm2, 2000s/mm2, and 2500s/mm2 in MRI prostate case cancer and to determine the most optimal b-value. Method: This study used a pre-exeachimental approach with a 1.5T Philips MRI machine at a private hospital in South Jakarta from March to April 2023. The sample consisted of 12 Prostate MRI images with DWI sequences and different b-values. Visual grading assessment was eachformed by three radiology specialists, and the data were analyzed using the Friedman test in SPSS. Results: The results showed a significant difference in anatomical image information based on the b-value variations used, with a p-value of 0.05 (0.02). The highest mean rank was obtained from the Friedman test for the b-value of 2000s/mm2. Conclusion: The significant difference in anatomical image information occurred due to differences in signal intensity and noise levels. Prostate cancer tissues appeared more hyperintense with lower noise in images with higher b-values, and vice versa. Additionally, the b-value of 2000s/mm2 resulted in the most optimal signal intensity and noise level. In conclusion, the use of b-value variations in axial DWI images of prostate cancer Prostate MRI  to differences in anatomical image information, with the most optimal image information observed at a b-value of 2000s/mm2.

References

E. Goljan, Rapid Review Pathology, 5th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2018.

C. Westbrook, Handbook of MRI Technique, 4th ed. SPi Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India, 2014.

A. Panda, V. Gulani, and L. Ponsky, A Practical Guide Reading MRI of the Prostate. Springer, 2020.

Q. Zeng, B. Jiang, F. Shi, C. Ling, F. Dong, and J. Zhang, “Bright edge sign on high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging as a new imaging biomarker to predict poor prognosis in glioma patients: A retrospective pilot study,” Front Oncol, vol. 9, 2019.

T. Metens, D. Miranda, J. Absil, and C. Matos, “What is the optimal b value in diffusion-weighted MR imaging to depict prostate cancer at 3T?,” European Radiology, vol. 22, no. 3. pp. 703–709, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2298-9.

Y. Ueno et al., “Ultra-high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of prostate cancer with 3-T MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 154–160, 2013, doi: 10.1002/jmri.23953.

S. Feuerlein, M. S. Davenport, A. Krishnaraj, E. M. Merkle, and R. T. Gupta, “Computed high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging improves lesion contrast and conspicuity in prostate cancer,” Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 155–160, 2015, doi: 10.1038/pcan.2015.5.

Faqirilmu.com, “Sampel Adalah : Syarat, Contoh dan Cara Menentukan Besar Sampel,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.faqirilmu.com/2022/10/pengertian-syarat-contoh-dan-cara-menentukan-besar-sampel.html

R. George, J. Dela Cruz, R. Singh, and D. R. Ilangovan, “MRIMASTER,” London, United Kingdom. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://mrimaster.com/

Z. Koc, G. Erbay, S. Ulusan, G. Seydaoglu, and F. Aka?Bolat, “Optimization of b value in diffusion?weighted MRI for characterization of benign and malignant gynecological lesions,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 650–659, 2012.

T. Geith et al., “Comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI and chemical-shift imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral body fractures,” American journal of roentgenology, vol. 199, no. 5, pp. 1083–1092, 2012.

M. I. Pratama, “Klasifikasi Citra MRI sebagai alat bantu diagnosis Jenis Penyakit Tumor Otak Menggunakan Transfer Learning VGG-16,” Doctoral dissertation, UGM. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/214628

Downloads

Published

2024-03-20

How to Cite

Agustina, N. D., Susanto, F., Utami, H. S., Setiarso, L. A., & Faisal, M. (2024). Variation of b Value for Axial DWI Prostate MR Imaging in Cancer: Which b Value is Optimal?. Proceedings Series on Health & Medical Sciences, 5, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.30595/pshms.v5i.965