Differences in Platelet Counts in K2edta Blood Samples with Varying Volumes Using a Hematology Analyzer

Authors

  • Alya Firda Mahfiroh
  • Uli Mas’uliyah Indarwati
  • Defi Nurul Hayati
  • Minto Rahaju

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/pshms.v9i1.2204

Keywords:

Anticoagulant, Hematology Analyzer, Platelet Count, K2EDTA

Abstract

Background: Platelet count examination is an essential hematological test that requires proper anticoagulant usage to prevent blood coagulation. The accuracy of platelet measurement is influenced by the proportion of anticoagulant and blood volume.

Method: This study used an observational cross-sectional design conducted at the Clinical Laboratory of Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto. A total of 15 samples were obtained using purposive sampling. Platelet counts were measured using a hematology analyzer with three blood volume variations (0.5 mL, 1 mL, and 3 mL). Data were analyzed using normality tests and one-way ANOVA.

Results: The mean platelet counts for 0.5 mL, 1 mL, and 3 mL samples were 23486.67, 24986.67, and 25206.67, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference (p = 0.375; p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Variations in blood sample volume in K2EDTA tubes do not significantly affect platelet count results when measured using a hematology analyzer.

References

[1] Syafaat, Safari. The role of hematology analyzers in clinical laboratories. Journal of Medical Technology. 2024;25(1):115–120.

[2] Hariyanto S, Hermawati AH, Prastama HY. Perbedaan EDTA konvensional dan EDTA vacutainer pada pemeriksaan kadar hemoglobin. Borneo Journal of Medical Laboratory Technology. 2024;6(2):614–620.

[3] Lestari A, Hartini S, Prihandono DS. Gambaran jumlah trombosit pada penggunaan antikoagulan Na2EDTA dan K2EDTA. Jurnal Kesehatan Tanbusai. 2023;4(3):3101–3108.

[4] Deviani S. Effect of sample volume variation on platelet count accuracy. Hematology Journal. 2017;19(4):203–210.

[5] Wahyu H, Analisawati ST, Linda W, Retno S. Perbedaan jumlah trombosit menggunakan antikoagulan K3EDTA dengan volume sampel berbeda. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin. 2022;1(10):3677–3681.

[6] Puspitasari, Aliviameita A. Pemeriksaan hematologi rutin. 2024.

[7] Syuhada S, Izzuddin A, Yudhistira H. Perbandingan trombosit dengan antikoagulan K2EDTA. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Sandi Husada. 2021;10(1):170–176.

[8] Wahdaniah W, Tumpuk S. Perbedaan penggunaan antikoagulan K2EDTA dan K3EDTA terhadap hasil pemeriksaan indeks eritrosit. Jurnal Laboratorium Khatulistiwa. 2018;1(2):114.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27

How to Cite

Mahfiroh, A. F., Indarwati, U. M., Hayati, D. N., & Rahaju, M. (2026). Differences in Platelet Counts in K2edta Blood Samples with Varying Volumes Using a Hematology Analyzer. Proceedings Series on Health & Medical Sciences, 9, 136–140. https://doi.org/10.30595/pshms.v9i1.2204