Legal Protection for Gojek Drivers Against Fictitious Orders with Cash On Delivery Payment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v14i.1025Keywords:
Legal Protection, Gojek Drivers, Fictitious OrdersAbstract
Transportation and humans are two things that cannot be separated. Currently, people often use transportation services with an online system in the form of applications on smartphones, especially Gojek. One of the Gojek services is the existence of food delivery services or Gofood, this service makes it very easy for consumers who cannot buy food directly. However, when doing their job it is not uncommon for the driver to experience losses, especially during cash on delivery transactions. This is due to fictitious orders by irresponsible consumers which can cause losses to drivers. Based on this background, this paper raises the following problem formulations a) How is legal protection for gojek drivers against fictitious orders with cash on delivery payments? b) How is the form of corporate liability of PT Gojek Indonesia for gojek drivers against fictitious orders with cash on delivery payments? The type of research used is normative juridical research, namely research that examines statutory provisions. Legal research uses various approaches with the aim of obtaining information from various aspects of the problem under study. The results of this study are that the legal protection of gojek partners for GoFood fictitious orders made by consumers is still not optimal. However, referring to article 1267 KUHPer gojek partners get legal protection when consumers make fictitious order actions, on the other hand these consumers have violated article 5 point (b) of Law Number 8 Year 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. PT Gojek Indonesia provides compensation in the form of a full refund in accordance with the loss of fictitious orders experienced by gojek drivers as a form of PT Gojek Indonesia's responsibility with its partners. The compensation process can be claimed by the customer to the Gojek Indonesia company with the loss claim procedure as determined by PT Gojek Indonesia. Submission of compensation claims can be submitted to the Branch Office of the gojek driver's operational area.
References
Abdul Khakim, 2003, Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia, Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Ahmadi Miru & Sutarman Yodo, 2015, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo persada.
Imam Sjahputra, 2010, Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Elektronik, Bandung: Erlangga Pustaka.
Johnny Ibrahim, 2006, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
John Rawls, 2001, A. Theory of Justice, Penerjemah Taufik, Teori Keadilan dasar-dasar filsafat politik untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan Sosial dalam Negara, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
J.S.Badudu dan Sutan Mohammad, 1994, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: PT. Integraphic.
Sajipto Raharjo, 2000, Ilmu hukum, Bandung: Citra abadi karya
Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji, 2003, Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan singkat, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Waliyullah, Wong Agung, “Perlindungan hukum terhadap pengemudi Go-Jek Atas pesanan fiktif di kota Yogyakarta”, skripsi fakultas syari’ah dan hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, (2020), 6
Agus Pribadiono, “Transportasi online vs Transportasi Tradisional non-online persaingan tidak sehat aspek pemanfaatan aplikasi oleh penyelenggara online”, Lex Jurnalica 13, No. 2 (2016)
Ari, Muhammad As, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perjanjian Jasa Transportasi Online”, Islamic business law review 1, No. 1 (2019)
Ari, Muhammad As, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perjanjian Jasa Transportasi Online”, Jurnal Hukum 5, No. 1 (2017)
Augustti, V. W, “Tanggung Jawab PT Go-Jek Indonesia terhadap Kerugian yang Diderita Pengemudi Go-Jek Melalui Fitur Go-Food”, Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 9, No. 1 (2018)
Caroline Sutandi, “Pentingnya Transportasi Umum Untuk Kepentingan Publik”, Jurnal Administrasi Publik 12, No. 1 (2015)
I Putu Wisna Dana, “Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Konsumen Go Food Dalam Transaksi E-commerce”, Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 1, No. 1 (2020)
Luthvi Febryka Nola, “Perjanjian Kemitraan Vs Perjanjian Kerja Bagi Pengemudi Ojek Online”, Jurnal Info Singkat 10, No. 7 (2018)
Nining Latianingsih, “Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Dalam Transaksi Elektronik Menurut Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronika”, Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis 11, No. 2 (2017)
Santoso, A, “Tanggung Jawab Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik Perbankan Dalam Kegiatan Transaksi Elektronik Pasca Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 5, No. 4 (2008)
Sinthiarahma Felyna Megawati, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Driver Ojek Online Terhadap Pembatalan Sepihak Oleh Konsumen Yang Tidak Beritikad Baik”, Jurnal Hukum Adigama 3, No. 2 (2020)
Tampubolon, W.S, “Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Ditinjau Dari Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen”, Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 4, No. 1 (2016)
Ketentuan Penggunaan Aplikasi Gojek Untuk Mitra, dikutip dari laman: https:// www.gojek.om/app/driver-contract/ ; diakses pada 26 Mei 2023
Agung Supriyanto, Nadiem Makarim, Pendiri CEO Gojek Indonesia: membangkitkan Gairah Usaha Tukang Ojek, dikutip dari laman: https://www.republika.co.id/ berita/o44e4715/nadiem-makarim-pendiri-dan-ceo-gojek-indonesia-membangkitkan-gairah-usaha-tukang-ojek ; diakses pada 16 Mei 2023
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
