Analysis of Final Summative Assessment Test Items for Grade 6 Elementary School in Physical Education Using Anates

Authors

  • Deppy Widianto SD Negeri Kutasari 03 Cipari, Cilacap
  • Wanda Nugroho Yanuarto Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Subuh Anggoro Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v25i.1695

Keywords:

Item Analysis, ANATES, Physical Education, Reliability, Difficulty Level, Discriminating Power, Distractor Effectiveness

Abstract

This study evaluated the quality of test items in the Physical Education, Sports, and Health (PJOK) Final Summative Assessment (ASAT) for Grade 6 students at SDN Kutasari 03 Cipari, Cilacap Regency. Using ANATES software, 25 multiple-choice and 10 essay questions were analyzed from a sample of 5 students. The analysis focused on reliability, discriminating power, difficulty level, and distractor effectiveness. Results revealed high reliability for multiple-choice questions (0.72) and very high reliability for essay questions (0.93). For multiple-choice items, 48% demonstrated good discriminating power, 32% had balanced difficulty levels, and 40% showed significant correlations with total scores. Among essay questions, 60% exhibited good discriminating power, and all items had moderate difficulty levels. Based on these findings, several test items require revision to enhance assessment quality in the Physical Education subject, particularly focusing on improving discriminating power and difficulty balance for optimal student evaluation.

References

Mardapi, D., & Kartowagiran, B. (2021). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan (Edisi 3). UNY Press.

Azwar, S. (2021). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (Edisi 5). Pustaka Pelajar.

Blegur, J., & Lumba, A. (2022). Evaluasi pendidikan jasmani: Analisis kualitas instrumen tes dan pengukuran. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga, 5(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v5i1.31569

Dewi, P. C., & Mukminan, M. (2023). Analisis kualitas butir soal ujian sekolah mata pelajaran PJOK dengan pendekatan ANATES. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keolahragaan, 8(1), 11-25.

Nuryadi, N., & Yanda, A. (2023). Software ANATES dan aplikasinya dalam analisis kualitas butir soal: Studi kasus pada mata pelajaran PJOK. Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment, 6(1), 28-41.

Gunawan, I. (2020). Metode penelitian: Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan evaluasi (Edisi 2). Universitas Negeri Malang.

Supriyadi, E. (2021). Analisis Butir Soal dengan Software ANATES Versi 4 dan ITEMAN. UNY Press.

Jannah, R. (2022). Analisis butir soal dengan bantuan aplikasi ANATES. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(2), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.26858/jip.v6i2.28901

Sukiman. (2021). Pengembangan sistem evaluasi pendidikan. Insan Madani.

Arifin, Z., & Retnawati, H. (2022). Analisis butir soal: Konstruksi dan aplikasi dalam penilaian. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v26i1.41270

Purwanto, A., & Angraini, R. (2020). Penggunaan software ANATES untuk validasi instrumen tes. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 332-341. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i2.27417

Febrilia, B. R. A. (2021). Analisis butir soal dalam evaluasi pendidikan: Konsep dasar penerapan. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 23(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v23i1.22440

Sutiasih, E., & Saputri, D. Y. (2022). Analisis butir soal ujian semester dengan program ANATES. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 7(1), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v7i1.2704

Widodo, A., & Kusnanik, N. W. (2023). Evaluasi pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 11(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v11i1.51327

Basuki, I., & Hariyanto. (2020). Asesmen pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arifin, Z. (2021). Evaluasi pembelajaran: Prinsip, teknik, dan prosedur. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-23

How to Cite

Widianto, D., Yanuarto, W. N., & Anggoro, S. (2025). Analysis of Final Summative Assessment Test Items for Grade 6 Elementary School in Physical Education Using Anates. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 25, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v25i.1695