Designing Material Learning for 5th Grade Elementary School using Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v12i.832Keywords:
Teaching Materials, STEM, Critical Thinking SkillsAbstract
This type of research uses research and development (R&D). This research aims to produce teaching materials based on Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics (STEM) and determine the feasibility of teaching materials. This teaching material is created and developed to improve critical thinking skills on the theme of events in the lives of elementary school students on the material properties nature of things. Research and development in the field of education uses the ADDIE model. Technique data analysis was carried out quantitatively and qualitatively. Data collection instruments in the form of tests and notes. Assessment of teaching materials based on Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics (STEM) according to the assessment of material experts and practitioners is feasible to use. Use of teaching-based materials STEM is feasible to improve critical thinking skills on the theme of events in the participant's life elementary school students on the material properties of objects. STEM- based teaching materials can not only be used in the research subject, but can be used as a source of learning and reference for schools. STEM- based teaching materials present material that is developmentally appropriate science and technology. The use of STEM- based teaching materials encourages educators to utilize technology to achieve understanding of thematic concepts to improve students' critical thinking skills to the maximum according to learning objectives.
References
L. Hewi and M. Shaleh, “Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini),” J. Golden Age, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 30–41, 2020, doi: 10.29408/jga.v4i01.2018.
S. Utami, “Meningkatkan mutu pendidikan Indonesia melalui peningkatan kualitas personal, profesional, dan strategi rekrutmen guru,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Pendidik. FKIP, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 518–527, 2019.
L. Joko Santoso, Yossita Wisman, “Potret Pendidikan di Indonesia 2020,” Survei Sos. Ekon. Nas., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–44, 2020.
W. Parniati, Y. A. Hadi, Z. Hamdi, and M. Husni, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis STEAM pada Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif di Kelas IV MI NW Ajan Tahun Pelajaran 2021/2022,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 6170–6176, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/1925
Yulia Dwi Susanti, Pengembangan Buku Desain Pembelajaran Berbasis STEAM pada Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas II SD Tema 2, Universita. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma, 2021.
W. Wiryanto, I. Ainurrohmah, and F. N. Yasin, “Keterlaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 Untuk Melatih Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Masa Pembelajaran Online Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Rev. Pendidik. Dasar J. Kaji. Pendidik. dan Has. Penelit., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 186–193, 2021, doi: 10.26740/jrpd.v7n3.p186-193.
L. W. Panuntun, “Optimalisasi Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Melalui Model Project Citizen Dalam Konteks Pembelajaran Abad 21,” Pros. Semin. dan Disk. Nas. Pendidik. Dasar “Menyongsong Transform. Pendidik. Abad 21,” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 159–168, 2018.
D. Aghnia Aisyah, H. Imansyah, and S. Feranie, “Pengaruh Reading Infusion Dalam Problem Based Learning Terhadap Perkembangan Keterampilan Abad 21 Siswa Sma Pada Materi Fluida Statis,” vol. 6, no. 2, 2021.
E. Shantia, “The Influence of Contextual Teaching and Learning ( CTL ) Learning Model on 21 st Century Skills of Students in Class X Biology Learning,” pp. 1792–1797, 2021.
L. Mukaromah, A. Mustadi, and A. Nisa, “Study of STEM Based on Local Wisdom in Hoening Science Process Skills in the 21st Century Era,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1168–1174, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1445.
Yuhana Elva and Ratna Kartika Irawati, “Pengaruh Project Based Learning – Stem (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Terhadap Pembelajaran Sains Pada Abad 21,” Ed-Humanistics J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 793–798, 2021, doi: 10.33752/ed-humanistics.v6i1.1463.
S. SUWARDI, “Stem (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Inovasi Dalam Pembelajaran Vokasi Era Merdeka Belajar Abad 21,” PAEDAGOGY J. Ilmu Pendidik. dan Psikol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2021, doi: 10.51878/paedagogy.v1i1.337.
S. Fithri, A. U. Tenri Pada*, W. Artika, C. Nurmaliah, and H. Hasanuddin, “Implementasi LKPD Berbasis STEM untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik,” J. Pendidik. Sains Indones., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 555–564, 2021, doi: 10.24815/jpsi.v9i4.20816.
K. Becker and K. Park, “Effects of integrative approaches among science , technology , engineering , and mathematics ( STEM ) subjects on students ’ learning?: A preliminary meta-analysis,” J. STEM Educ., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 23–38, 2011.
M. F. Nurhidayat and M. Asikin, “Bahan Ajar Berbasis STEM dalam Pembelajaran Matematika?: Potensi dan Metode Pengembangan,” Prism. Prosicing Semin. Nas. Mat., vol. 4, pp. 298–302, 2021.
A. F. Rahamatina Awwali Cut, Janna Missbahul, “Jurnal Phi Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Science , Technology , Engineering , and Mathematics,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Fis. Terap., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2020.
Y. Yuanita and F. Kurnia, “PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR BERBASIS STEM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS) MATERI KELISTRIKAN UNTUK SEKOLAH DASAR,” Profesi Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 199–210, 2019, doi: 10.23917/ppd.v1i2.9046.
M. Develaki, “Comparing Crosscutting Practices in STEM Disciplines: Modeling and Reasoning in Mathematics, Science, and Engineering,” Sci. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 949–979, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11191-020-00147-1.
H. Özkul and M. Özden, “Investigation of the Effects of Engineering-Oriented STEM Integration Activities on Scientific Process Skills and STEM Career Interests: A Mixed Methods Study,” Egit. ve Bilim, vol. 45, no. 204, pp. 41–63, 2020, doi: 10.15390/EB.2020.8870.
A. Leung, “Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00212-9.
J. Hallström and K. J. Schönborn, “Models and modelling for authentic STEM education: reinforcing the argument,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-019-0178-z.
R. M. Felder, “STEM education: A tale of two paradigms,” J. Food Sci. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2021, doi: 10.1111/1541-4329.12219.
C. V Mcdonald, “STEM Education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 530–569, 2016.
Y. Li et al., “Design and Design Thinking in STEM Education,” J. STEM Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93–104, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s41979-019-00020-z.
Y. Xie, M. Fang, and K. Shauman, “STEM Education,” Annu. Rev. Sociol., vol. 41, no. April, pp. 331–357, 2015, doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659.
Y. Li, K. Wang, Y. Xiao, J. E. Froyd, and S. B. Nite, “Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic analysis of publicly funded projects,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00213-8.
A. Bozkurt, H. Ucar, G. Durak, and S. Idin, “The current state of the art in STEM research: A systematic review study,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 374–383, 2019, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v14i3.3447.
V. A. Fitria, A. R. Habibi, L. Hakim, and M. Islamiyah, “Using Canva to Support Online Learning Media for Students at Mahardika Karangploso Vocational School in Malang during the Pandemic,” J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 75–82, 2021, [Online]. Available: www.canva.com
E. Nuryasana and N. Desiningrum, “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Strategi Belajar Mengajar Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa,” J. Inov. Penelit., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 967–974, 2020, doi: 10.47492/jip.v1i5.177.
F. Susilawati, G. Gunarhadi, and H. Hartono, “Pentingnya Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik Dalam Peningkatkan Karakter Peduli Lingkungan Siswa,” EduHumaniora | J. Pendidik. Dasar Kampus Cibiru, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 62–68, 2020, doi: 10.17509/eh.v12i1.15068.
Sugiyono, METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF KUALITATIF dan R&D, 3rd ed. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.
A. K. N. Hess and K. Greer, “Designing for engagement: Using the ADDIE model to integrate high-impact practices into an online information literacy course,” Commun. Inf. Lit., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 264–282, 2016, doi: 10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.27.
F. Susanto and I. R. Ayuni, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Kooperatif Tipe Nht Dengan Strategi Pemecahan Masalah (Problem Solving) Sistematis Bagi Peserta Didik Smp Di Kabupaten Pringsewu,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 301, 2017, doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v6i3.1054.
E. Mie, M. Kuliah, and K. Dan, “Addie Sebagai Model Pengembangan Media Instruksional,” J. Pendidik. Teknol. dan Kejuru., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 277–286, 2018.
D. Program, S. Pendidikan, G. Sekolah, and U. S. Dharma, “Buku teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian”.
Prio Wibowo, Pembelajaran STEM di Sekolah Dasar, 1st ed. Banyumas: Eduvation, 2019.
S. Arikunto, PROSEDUR PENELITIAN?: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2013.
C. Puspa and I. G. A. Sudibya, “KOMITMEN ORGANISASI DENGAN EFEK MEDIASI PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT PADA PT . PLN ( PERSERO ) DISTRIBUSI BALI Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana ( Unud ), Bali , Indonesia Hasil observasi langsung di perusahaan , permasalahan yang terjadi pada ,” vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 5143–5171, 2016.
L. Nul Hakim, “Ulasan Metodologi Kualitatif: Wawancara Terhadap Elit,” Aspirasi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 165–172, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
