Analisa Status Tentara Bayaran dalam Konflik Bersenjata dan Dampaknya bagi Perdamaian Dunia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Humaniter Internasional

Authors

  • Achmad Fahrurrozi Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Dennise Ignacia Evania Valda Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v17i.1100

Keywords:

Mercenaries, International Humanitarian Law, Implications

Abstract

This article examines the status of mercenaries in international armed conflicts. Mercenaries are not a new concept in International Law and International Humanitarian Law, both in terms of theory and practice. In Additional Protocol I Article 47 of the 1977 Geneva Conventions, mercenaries are specifically defined with certain criteria. This definition applies to armed conflicts, both domestic and international. In addition, this definition is also relevant in situations of mass violence aimed at overthrowing a government or threatening a country's constitution, law, economy, financial order or valuable natural resources. Although mercenaries are legally recognized in Article 47 of the 1977 Additional Protocol, they do not have rights as combatants and prisoners of war, this places them in a gray zone status, so they may violate existing international legal instruments and have a negative impact on stability and security.

References

Andrew, “Pengertian Hukum Internasional Menurut Para Ahli beserta Peranannya,” Gramedia Literasi. Accessed: Apr. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.gramedia.com/literasi/hukum-internasional/

M. Kusumaatmadja, Hukum Internasional Humaniter dalam Pelaksanaan dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Bandung: Binacipta, 1980.

G. A. B. Agustiyono elfondag lay riwu, Dhesy A.Kase, “Anak Sebagai Tentara Dalam Konflik Bersenjata Menurut Hukum Humaniter Internasional Dan Konvensi Hak Anak 1989,” Petitum Law J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.35508/pelana.v1i1.

E. Erwin and H. Herlina, “TENTARA BAYARAN DALAM KAITAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KERAPUHAN PERDAMAIAN INTERNASIONAL,” TANJUNGPURA LAW J., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 65, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.26418/tlj.v7i1.61448.

C. S. Marnani, “FENOMENA TENTARA BAYARAN DAN KEMUNGKINAN IMPLEMENTASINYA DI INDONESIA,” J. Din. Glob., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 267–287, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.36859/jdg.v8i2.1907.

J. Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Banyumedia Publishing 57, 2006.

Y. Nurhayati, I. Ifrani, and M. Y. Said, “METODOLOGI NORMATIF DAN EMPIRIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF ILMU HUKUM,” J. Penegakan Huk. Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14.

D. Nurcahyo Nugroho and A. Torry Satriyo Kusumo, “Pertanggungjawaban Coercive Services Oleh Private Military and Security Company Dalam Konflik Bersenjata,” Belli Ac Pacis, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 32–44, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/belli.v5i1.40019.

N. P. E. Daniati, D. G. S. Mangku, and P. R. Yuliartini, “Status Hukum Tentara Bayaran Dalam Hukum Humaniter Internasional,” J. Komunitas Yust. Univ. Pendidik. Ganesha Progr., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 283–294, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v3i3.32874.

E. Liminanto, J. Augustina, Y. Wattimena, J. Steny, F. Peilouw, and : Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, “Urgensi Pengaturan Private Military Contractors (PMCs) Dalam Hukum Humaniter Internasional,” J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 163–172, 2021, doi: 10.47268/tatohi.v1i3.567.

ICRC, “The Geneva Conventions of 12 august 1949,” Geneva Conv., no. August, p. 224, 1949.

Dirjen Administrasi Hukum Umum Departemen Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia, “Pertikaian-Pertikaian Bersenjata Internasional (Protokol I) Dan Bukan Internasional (Protokol Ii),” no. Protokol I Protokol II, p. 110, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://blogs.icrc.org/indonesia/protokol-tambahan-i-dan-ii-tahun-1977/

J. I. Levitt, “OAU Convention for the Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa,” Africa Sel. Doc. Const. Confl. Secur. Humanit. Judic. Issues, no. July, pp. 249–256, 2021, doi: 10.1163/9789004479708_016.

A. Trkkaya, “International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries, 4 December 1989,” Kashmir Neighb. Tale, Terror. Truce, no. July 1977, pp. 252–256, 2021, doi: 10.4324/9781315192642-59.

H. R. Council, “General Assembly,” Int. Organ., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 498–512, Nov. 1954, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300007499.

J. S. Geraldy Diandra Aditya, Soekotjo Hardiwinoto, “Peran Dan Status Private Military Companies Dalam Konflik Bersenjata Ditinjau Dari Hukum Humaniter Internasional,” Diponegoro Law J., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2017.14371.

G. Karwur, “Status Hukum Serta Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Perekrutan Private Military and Security Companies Ditinjau Dari Hukum Humaniter Internasional,” Lex Crim., vol. III, no. 4, pp. 131–138, 2014.

Anggeraine Wulan Aji Tabah, “PEMBERIAN SANKSI TERHADAP ADANYA TENTARA BAYARAN ATAS KETERLIBATAN DALAM SENGKETA BERSENJATA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM HUMANITER INTERNASIONAL,” J. Pacta Sunt Servanda, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 110–119, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal2.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPSS/article/view/1409/684

J. Indrawan, “Status Perusahaan Militer Dan Keamanan Swasta (Private Military and Security Companies) Dalam Hukum Humaniter Internasional,” J. Pertahanan Bela Negara, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 115–136, 2018, doi: 10.33172/jpbh.v4i1.325.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Fahrurrozi, A., & Valda, D. I. E. (2024). Analisa Status Tentara Bayaran dalam Konflik Bersenjata dan Dampaknya bagi Perdamaian Dunia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 17, 33–37. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v17i.1100

Issue

Vol. 17 (2024): Proceedings of Seminar International Legal Development in Twenty-First Century Era

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.