Analisis Yuridis Normatif terhadap Efektifitas Hukum dalam Penindakan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia: Tinjauan terhadap Peran Hukum Pidana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v17i.1172Keywords:
Corruption, Criminal Law, Juridical AnalysisAbstract
Corruption is a serious problem that damages the social, economic and political order in various countries, especially Indonesia. Corruption has a broad and detrimental impact on society and the state, such as obstruction of development, reduced public trust in institutions, and social and economic disparities. The purpose of this research is to find out how the effectiveness of criminal law in prosecuting corruption in Indonesia based on normative juridical analysis and how the application of criminal law in prosecuting corruption in Indonesia. The type of method used by the author in this research is Normative Juridical research, which is a library legal research conducted by examining library materials or periodic secondary data. Thus the object analyzed with a qualitative approach is a research method that refers to the legal norms contained in the legislation. The conclusion of this research is that as a state of law, Indonesia must carry out a law enforcement process for corruption to ensure the rule of law, justice and peace in society. However, it is clear that law enforcement of corruption in Indonesia is still weak. This is due to the fact that there are still many lawmakers or law enforcers who commit corruption. The existence of lawmakers or law enforcers who commit corruption can reduce public trust in them. And the advice that can be given is that the government needs to revise the laws related to the eradication of corruption to eliminate legal loopholes that can be utilized by perpetrators of corruption. The application of strict sanctions in accordance with the level of crime committed must be carried out to show the government's commitment to eradicating corruption. It is also hoped that the government will harmonize the corruption law with other related regulations to avoid overlap and ensure harmony in law enforcement.
References
W. Setiadi, “Korupsi Di Indonesia,” J. Legis. Indones., vol. 15, no. 3, 2018.
R. Ka’bah, “Korupsi di Indonesia,” J. Huk. Pembang., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2007.
R. Baswir, “Dinamika korupsi di Indonesia: dalam perspektif struktural,” J. Univ. Paramadina, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2002.
I. W. Joniarta, “Banalitas korupsi di Indonesia,” J. Ilm. Din. Sos., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 149–156, 2018.
G. Orlando, “Efektivitas Hukum dan Fungsi Hukum di Indonesia,” Tarb. bil Qalam, vol. 6, pp. 50–58, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi_zMfP4YOGAxXsRmwGHbmZCAAQFnoECBAQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fejurnal.stita.ac.id%2Findex.php%2FTBQ%2Farticle%2Fview%2F77&usg=AOvVaw3mI-yeU0QNSeHrqc_gkOwX&opi=89978449
H. Firman and A. Candra, “Efektifitas Hukum Pidana Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi,” J. Serambi Huk., vol. 17, no. 01, pp. 142–157, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v17i01.904.
A. A. Karunia, “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pisana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Lawrence M. Friedman,” J. Huk. dan Pembang. Ekon., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 115–128, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v10i1.62831.
F. Santiago, “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Penegak Hukum untuk Terciptanya Ketertiban Hukum,” Pagaruyuang Law J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–43, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v1i1.268.
P. Studi, S. Ilmu, F. Hukum, and U. Diponegoro, “Abdul Fatah *, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya , Henny Juliani karena dampak yang ditimbulkan oleh menyebutkan total kerugian keuangan PW?: Penyalahgunaan Wewenang ( Sumber?: Indonesia Corruption Watch ) Pada,” vol. 6, no. 31, pp. 1–15, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2017.13880.
A. A. Karunia, “penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di indonesia dalam perspektif teori lawrence m. Friedman,” J. Huk. Dan Pembang. Ekon., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 115–128, 2022.
M. Muntaha, H. Amelia, and N. E. Baskoro, “Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Penanggulngan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia,” PEMULIAAN Huk., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2021.
V. Kurnia, S. Lasmadi, and E. Siregar, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tugas dan Kewenangan Jaksa sebagai Penyidik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” PAMPAS J. Crim. Law, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.22437/pampas.v1i3.11084.
F. Hukum, U. Warmadewa, and P. Pengembalian, “Prosedur Pengembalian Dan Pemulihan Kerugian,” vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 573–579, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://repositori.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/15894/150200548.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
S. V. Tulung and H. Yusuf, “Menghadapi Dilema Penegakan Hukum Mengenai Hambatan Dan Strategi Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi,” J. Dimens. Huk., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2024.
R. Rasmuddin, K. Kamaruddin, and W. Umar, “Penerapan Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Pertimbangan Dan Hambatan,” J. Rechtens, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 125–140, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.4.2020.432-442
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
