Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability using the Discovery Learning Model with the Probing-Prompting technique for Vocational High School Students

Authors

  • Idhata Nurbaiti Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Akhmad Jazuli Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Keywords:

Discovery learning model, Probing-Prompting technique, Trigonometry, Vocational high school

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the mathematical creative thinking ability of Kesatrian Purwokerto High School students on the topic of trigonometry using the Discovery learning model and Probing-Prompting technique. The research design used true experimental design type post test only control design. The research sample was X TJKT 1 class of 37 students and X TJKT 2 class of 36 students and used cluster random sampling technique. Of the two classes taken TJKT 1 class as an experiment, TJKT 2 class as a control.The results showed: 1) There is an effect of Probing Prompting learning model on students' creative thinking skills, 2) There is an influence of the discovery learning model on students' thinking skills. The conclusion of this study shows that the ability to think creatively using the probing prompting technique is better than the class that uses the discovery learning model.

References

Amsari, D., Arnawa, I. M. and Yerizon (2022) ‘Development of a Local Instructional Theory for the Sequences and Series Concept Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning’, Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, pp. 434–449.

Ashcraft, M. H. (1992) ‘Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory’, Cognition, 44(1), pp. 75–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90051-I.

Hadar, L. L. and Tirosh, M. (2019) ‘Creative thinking in mathematics curriculum: An analytic framework’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, p. 100585. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100585.

Hakim, A. R. (2014) ‘PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GENERATIF TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA’, ARIF RAHMAN HAKIM, 4(20), pp. 196–207.

Ketelhut, D. J. et al. (2020) ‘Teacher Change Following a Professional Development Experience in Integrating Computational Thinking into Elementary Science’, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), pp. 174–188. doi: 10.1007/s10956-019-09798-4.

Maullina, E. S. and Setyaningsih, N. (2023) ‘Students ’ Ability to Solve Arithmetic Problems Based on APOS Theory in Cognitive Styles Differences’, Numerical: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), pp. 13–26.

Miles, M., Huberman, M. and Saldaña, J. (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, Zeitschrift fur Personalforschung.

Nuha, M. A., Suhito and Masrukan (2014) ‘Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Geometri dan Karakter Siswa SMP Kelas VIII Melalui Pembelajaran Model 4K’, Jurnal Kreano, 5(September), pp. 188–194.

Nur, A. S. and Palobo, M. (2018) ‘Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gaya Kognitif dan Gender’, Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9(2), pp. 139–148.

Octaviana, P. and Setyaningsih, N. (2022) ‘Kompetensi Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Persoalan HOTS Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar’, AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), pp. 1436–1452.

Pelo, F. M., Nihayah, E. F. K. and Hasman (2021) ‘Analisis Kesalahan Konseptual Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Barisan dan Deret Aritmatika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif’, Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 12(1), pp. 73–83.

Prafianti, R. A. et al. (2023) ‘Analysis of Student ’ s Creative Thinking Ability on Arithmetic Sequences in the Lesson Study Framework’, Vygotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 5(1), pp. 55–64.

Rahayu, R. et al. (2022) ‘Problem-Solving Process of Students with a Reflective Cognitive Style Based on the Action-Process-Object-Schema Theory’, European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), pp. 41–58.

Rambe, A. Y. F. and Arfi, L. D. (2020) ‘Issn 2087-8249 e-issn 2580-0450’, AXIOM?: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Matematika, 09(2), pp. 175–187.

Silver, E. A. (1997) ‘Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing’, ZDM Mathematic Education, 29(3), pp. 75–80. doi: 10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x.

Singer, F. M. and Voica, C. (2022) ‘Playing on patterns: is it a case of analogical transfer?’, ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54(1), pp. 211–229. doi: 10.1007/s11858-022-01334-w.

Siregar, M. B. and Narpila, S. D. (2023) ‘Influence of Problem- Based Learning Model on Students ’ Critical Thinking Ability and Learning Motivation in Mathematics Learning’, Numerical: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), pp. 263–274.

Syarifah, Z. A. and Yanuarto, W. N. (2023) ‘EKSPLORASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA BERBASIS TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL AND CONTENT KNOWLEDGE ( TPACK )’, Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), pp. 208–214.

Wilkins, J. L. M., MacDonald, B. L. and Norton, A. (2022) ‘Construction of subitized units is related to the construction of arithmetic units’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(1), pp. 137–154. doi: 10.1007/s10649-021-10076-7.

Yusnaeni et al. (2017) ‘Creative Thinking of Low Academic Student Undergoing Search Solve Create and Share Learning Integrated with Metacognitive Strategy’, International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), pp. 245–262.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-23

How to Cite

Nurbaiti, I., & Jazuli, A. (2025). Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability using the Discovery Learning Model with the Probing-Prompting technique for Vocational High School Students. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 25, 420–427. Retrieved from https://conferenceproceedings.ump.ac.id/pssh/article/view/1729

Similar Articles

<< < 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.