Metode STEAM sebagai Inovasi Pembelajaran IPS Di Era Abad 21
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v3i.400Keywords:
STEAM, Learning Innovation, Student ActivityAbstract
The application of STEM-based learning is expected to increase the activeness of students in social studies subjects. STEM-based learning was chosen to solve problems systematically, with creativity in applying scientific principles. The STEAM method as Social Science Learning Innovation in the 21st Century Era is one method that can be used for learning various current and future sciences. A teacher must be able to create a process that is fun, contextual, effective, or optimally efficient so that students can play an active role in the learning process. The STEAM method is the basis for the method in the learning process to teach abilities that refer to the development of a comprehensive world of technology. Steam (science, technology, engineering, arts, match) is a collaboration between science and everyday life. The purpose of this research is to find out that the steam method will improve students' learning abilities. This type of research is a field research with a qualitative descriptive method. The subjects of this study were students of class VII C of Junior Hight School 4 Cilacap, totaling 32 students. Data collection techniques used are observation techniques, and documentation. While the data analysis technique is qualitative analysis to determine the increase in student learning activity.
References
T. Taniredja, E. M. Faridli, and S. Harmianto, “MODEL-MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INOVATIF.” p. 128, 2011.
W. Widyaningrum, E. Sondari, and Mulyati, “Meningkatkan Kompetensi Profesionalisme Guru Di Abad 21 Melalui Pelatihan Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris,” Dedik. J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/index.php/JPM/article/view/1600.
Andriyani Esti, “MENGEMBANGKAN PROFESIONALITAS GURU ABAD 21 MELALUI PROGRAM PEMBIMBINGAN YANG EFEKTIF,” Manag. Pendidik., vol. 02, pp. 1–17, 2010.
Syafaruddin, “Pembelajaran inovatif dan kompetensi sosial guru,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Tah. Fak. Ilmu Sos. Univ. Negeri Medan, pp. 1–6, 2017.
A. Hidayat, M. Sa’diyah, and S. Lisnawati, “Metode Pembelajaran Aktif Dan Kreatif Pada Madrasah Diniyah Takmiliyah Di Kota Bogor,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 09, no. 01 Februari, pp. 71–86, 2020.
N. Sa’ida, “Implementasi Model Pembelajaran STEAM pada Pembelajaran Daring,” J. Rev. Pendidik. Dasar J. Kaji. Pendidik. dan Has. Penelit., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 123–128, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/PD/article/view/13955.
P. Sahlberg, “Educational Change in Finland,” Second Int. Handb. Educ. Chang., pp. 323–348, 2010, doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6.
L. Darsani, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA,” J. Pedagog. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 377, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jp2.v2i3.19293.
R. D. Prayogi and R. Estetika, “Kecakapan Abad 21: Kompetensi Digital Pendidik Masa Depan,” J. Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 144–151, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.p21.org.
M. Mulyadi, “Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Serta Pemikiran Dasar Menggabungkannya [Quantitative and Qualitative Research and Basic Rationale to Combine Them],” J. Stud. Komun. dan Media, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 128, 2019.
A. Prabowo and Heriyanto, “Analisis Pemanfaatan Buku Elektronik (E-Book) Oleh Pemustaka di Perpustakaan SMA Negeri 1 Semarang [Analysis of the Utilization of Electronic Books (E-Books) by Pemustaka at the SMA Negeri 1 Semarang Library],” J. Ilmu Perpust., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/3123.
A. Syamsudin, “Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Non Tes (Informal) untuk Menjaring Data Kualitatif Perkembangan Anak Usia Dini,” Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, vol. 3, no. 1. 2015, doi: 10.21831/jpa.v3i1.2882.
Suci Arischa, “Analisis Beban Kerja Bidang Pengelolaan Sampah Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kebersihan Kota Pekanbaru,” J. Online Mhs. Univ. Riau, vol. 6, no. Edisi 1 Januari-Juni 2019, pp. 1–15, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://weekly.cnbnews.com/news/article.html?no=124000.
N. R. F. Kanza, A. D. Lesmono, and H. M. Widodo, “Analisis Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Project Based Learning Dengan Pendekatan Stem Pada Pembelajaran Fisika Materi Elastisitas Di Kelas Xi Mipa 5 Sma Negeri 2 Jember,” J. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 71, 2020, doi: 10.19184/jpf.v9i1.17955.
A. P. (alimperanginangin@gmail.com), H. Barus, and R. Gulo, “PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA YANG DI AJAR DENGAN MODEL MODEL KONVENSIONAL Model,” vol. 3, pp. 43–50, 2020.
E. Yulianti and I. Gunawan, “Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL): Efeknya Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Berpikir Kritis,” Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 399–408, 2019, doi: 10.24042/ijsme.v2i3.4366.
R. Humairah Amir and R. Yuliana Purwanti, “Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Steam (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics) Pada Siswa Kelas Iv Sd,” JKPD (Jurnal Kaji. Pendidik. Dasar), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://36.89.54.123/index.php/jkpd/article/view/4166.
E. Sa’adhah, “PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STEM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS) SEBAGAI UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KEAKTIFAN DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN DASAR LISTRIK DAN ELEKTRONIKA DI SMK N 1 NANGGULAN,” vol. 110265, no. 2012, p. 110493, 2019.
