A Phonological Analysis of English Brand Name Pronunciations by Indonesian, Japanese, and Korean Speakers: A Study of World Englishes

Authors

  • Rossy Maldini Universitas Kuningan
  • Agata Pritha Kinanditya Universitas Kuningan
  • Anita Amelia Universitas Kuningan
  • Endang Darsih Universitas Kuningan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v24i.1589

Keywords:

Phonological Adaptation, Brand Name Pronunciation, World Englishes, Phonotactics, Mother Tongue

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the phonological adaptation patterns in the pronunciation of English brand names by native speakers of Indonesian, Japanese, and Korean. This study distinct from the phenomenon of globalization and the expantion of international brands, which provide phonological issues, Particulary  when foreign words must be adapted to the phonological system of the mother tongue (L1). by Using a qualitative approach and descriptive phonological analysis, the data were collected from the pronunciation of famous brands by speakers from the three language groups. The findings indicate that segmental and suprasegmental adaptations are heavily influenced by the phonotactic structure of each L1. Japanese and Korean speakers typically use epenthesis and simplify segments to maintain the dominant CV syllable structure, whereas Indonesian speakers are more flexsible and frequently to keep the original sounds Furthermore, stress and intonation in speech show changes that match L1 prosody patterns. Sociolinguistic factors such as brand proximity also influence the level of adaption.  This research increases the understanding of pronunciation variance in the context of World Englishes and gives implications for foreign language pronunciation education as well as interlingual phonology studies.

References

Adlini, M. N., Dinda , A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Edumaspul, 6(1), 974-980.

Al-Mutairi, M. A. (2020). Kachru’s Three Concentric Circles Model of English Language: An Overview of Criticism & the Place of Kuwait in it. English Language Teaching, 13(1).

Anggreni, m., & Subiyanto, A. (2024). Phonological Process of Word-Final Consonant Sounds in Indonesian Learners by Japanese Speakers (Case Study of Japanesia Online Course Students). 12(2).

Aryanika, S. (2024). The Influence of First Language on Second Language Pronunciation. Fonologi Jurnal Ilmuan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 3(1), 32-47.

Beristain, A. (2023). Gestural Timing Patterns of Nasality in Highly Proficient Spanish Learners of English: Aerodynamic Evidence. Language and speech.

Chen, H., Lee, D. T., Luo, Z., Lai, R., Cheung, H., & Nazzi, T. (2020). Variation in phonological bias: Bias for vowels, rather than consonants or tones in lexical processing by Cantonese-learning toddlers.

Choi, M. J. (2024). Phonetic Variation in the Pronunciation of English Loanwords in South Korean Media: A Corpus-Based Study. ournal of Linguistics and Communication Studies, 3(4), 6-13.

Chu, C.-Y. (2022, Agustus 30). Conceptual Investigation of the Global Significance of English Language: A Contextual Study with Special Reference to India. Research Ambition?: An International Multidisciplinary e-Journal, 7(II), 01-03.

Colontoni, L., Kochetov, A., & Steele, J. (2023). Articulatory Insights into the L2 Acquisition of English-/l/ Allophony. Language and Speech.

Dübbert, A. (2021). Brand names as multimodal constructions. Linguistics Vanguard.

Jajo-Yacoub, K., & Ramirez, M. (2023). Phonological Differences Across Varieties of Latin American Spanish. Canadian Journal for the Academic.

Joshi, A. (2023). Language Variation and Change in World Englishes: Case Studies and Analysis. Journal of International English Research Studies, 1(2).

JKachru, B. B. (2006). English: World Englishes. 125-202.

Kawase, S., Davis, C., & Kim , J. (n.d.). Impact of Japanese L1 Rhythm on English L2 Speech. 2024.

Kim, J.-m. (2020). Phonology of Brand Naming.

Lalic-Vucetic, Z. N., & Seva, S. (2021). Odnos teksta i ilustracije - perspektiva ilustratora i u?itelja. 34(2).

Motoki, K., Park, J., Pathak, A. K., & Spence, C. (2022). The connotative meanings of sound symbolism in brand names: A conceptual framework. Journal Businnes Reseach, 150, 365-373.

Pratidina, R. G., & Subiyanto, A. (2024). The Characteristics of Korean Artists in Pronouncing English Words on Korean Reality Shows: A Generative Phonology Perspective. Rainbow : Journal literature, Linguistic and Culture Studies, 13(1).

Schettino, L., & Cutugno, F. (2025). Quantifying and Characterizing Phonetic Reduction in Italian Natural Speech.

Shen, Y. (2023). Phonological variation and its social implications in multilingual communities. Environment and Social Psychology.

Syafutri, T., & Saputra, A. (2021). The First Language Interference toward Students’ English Speaking as Foreign Language. 7(1), 39-51.

Tanaka, Y. (2023). Phonology of proper names. Language and Linguistics Compass.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-19

How to Cite

Maldini, R., Kinanditya, A. P., Amelia, A., & Darsih, E. (2025). A Phonological Analysis of English Brand Name Pronunciations by Indonesian, Japanese, and Korean Speakers: A Study of World Englishes. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 24, 171–175. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v24i.1589

Most read articles by the same author(s)