Penerapan Student Facilitator And Explaining pada Peningkatan Keaktifan, Motivasi, dan Hasil Belajar IPS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v3i.410Keywords:
Student Facilitator and Explaining, Keaktifan, Motivasi, Hasil Belajar IPSAbstract
This research aimed to increase activeness, motivation, and social studies learning outcomes through the application of the Student Facilitator and Explaining model to fifth-grade students at SD Negeri Tunggorono Purworejo for the 2021/2022 academic year. This type of research is classroom action research. The research subjects were students of class V SD Negeri Tunggorono, totaling 12 students. The research stages include 4 stages, namely planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. Data collection techniques using documentation, questionnaires, observations, and tests. The data analysis technique used was descriptive quantitative with percentages. The results showed that 1) the use of the Student Facilitator and Explaining learning model could increase the activeness of students in the high category, from 33.33% in the pre-cycle, to 66.67% in the first cycle and 91.67% in the second cycle; 2) the use of the Student Facilitator and Explaining learning model can increase the motivation of students in the high category from 41.67% in the pre-cycle, to 75% in the first cycle and 91.67% in the second cycle; 3) the use of the Student Facilitator and Explaining learning model can improve the social studies learning outcomes of students who complete the pre-cycle by 33.33%, increase to 75% in the first cycle, and become 100% in the second cycle.
References
Suharsimi Arikunto, Suhardjono, and Supardi, Penelitian Tindakan kelas, Ke-3. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2019.
W. Sanjaya, Strategi pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2013.
A. Lisdiana, Materi Pelatihan Guru Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2015.
E. S. Wahyuningsih, Model Pembelajaran Mastery Learning. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama, 2020.
N. Y. Putri, “Hubungan keaktifan belajar siswa.” p. 133, 2019.
E. John and C. Claassen, “ACTIVE LEARNING HANDBOOK LESSONS LEARNED FROM A FINNISH - NAMIBIAN COLLABORATION ON EDUCATION,” pp. 10–11, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sykoy.fi/wp-content/uploads/Active-learning-handbook-14.4..pdf.
P. Preville, The Active Learning Handbook. Washington DC: wa, 2020.
Sinar, Metode Active Learning Upaya Peningkatan Keaktifan dan hasil Belajar Siswa. 2018.
O. Hamalik, Kurikulum dan Pemebelajaran. Jakarta, 2011.
N. Sudjana, Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2016.
N. Purwanto, Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2013.
M. F. C. B. M. B. M. Horvathova, “Character education for the 21st century,” Cent. Curric. Redesign, no. February, pp. 10, 25, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/CCR-CharacterEducation_FINAL_27Feb2015.pdf.
A. Sharah and I. B. M. Astawa, “motivasi belajar, kebiasan belajar dan hasil belajar.” Singaraja, p. 71, 2018.
A. Sholihah and R. Y. Kurniawan, “Pengaruh motivasi dan kebiasaan belajar terhadap hasil belajar geografi siswa SMA negeri di kota singaraja.” Surabaya, p. 2, 2016.
D. H. Schunk, Learning Theories An Educational Perspective, vol. 322, no. 6078. Boston: Pearson, 2012.
P. A. Prawira, Psikologi Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Baru. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2014.
E. T. Lestari, Perbedaan Sikap Belajar, Motivasi belajar, dan Prestasi Belajar IPS dengan model Discovery Learning dan Konvesional, Rumah Kita. Kendal, 2020.
R. A. Sani, Evaluasi Proses dan Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2020.
Slameto, Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2015.
Trianto, Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif, Jakarta: Kencana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
