Double Certificates and Its Resolution in (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 976 K/PDT/2015)

Authors

  • Soediro Soediro Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Ika Ariani Kartini Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Efi Miftah Faridli Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Nur’aeni Nur’aeni Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v14i.910

Keywords:

Double Certificates, PTSL, Blockchain

Abstract

One of the goals of the Basic Agrarian Law (Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, UUPA) is to provide legal certainty for all individuals and to facilitate the functioning of the earth, water, and space, as well as natural resources. In reality, however, the law has not yet provided legal certainty over land in the case of double certificates, as stated in Supreme Court Decision No. 976 K/PDT of 2015. The problem posed by this study is how and what the obstacles are for prevent the development of duplicate certificates. This is normative legal research employing secondary data, the statute approach, and the conceptual approach. To prevent the occurrence of double certificates, it is necessary to implement a computerization/digitization program for land registration maps to reduce error by humans, acquire data on land parcels that have certificates, make plotting efforts utilizing GPS (Global Positioning System) technology, restrict the land registration process and administration pertaining to village land, and implement blockchain technology in land administration. Meanwhile, the public's lack of interest in registering their land through the Comprehensive Systematic Land Registration (Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap, PTSL) scheme, procedural errors in the land assessment procedure, a negative land publication system in which the data presented is not necessarily valid, and the state's inability to guarantee the accuracy of the data presented are impediments to these efforts. Moreover, the present agrarian law is a colonialist relic that is not in the community's best interests.

References

Adjie, Zuman Malaka and Habib. “Tanggung Jawab Kantor Pertanahan Terhadap Terbitnya Sertifikat Ganda (Studi Kasus Putusan Kasasi MA No. 162 K/TUN/2012).” Al-Qanun 20, no. 2 (2017): 1–24.

Harsono, Boedi. Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi Dan Pelaksanaanya. Jakarta: Djambatan, 1999.

Hufadzah, Natasha Camilla, Iga Gangga Santi, and F.C Susila Adiyanta. “Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah Terhadap Sertipikat Ganda (Studi Putusan Nomor: 062/G/2014/PTUN.SMG).” Dipenogoro Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2017): 1–12.

Irawan, Hadi, Ida Bagus Rai Djaja, and Nyoman A. Martana. “Studi Kasus Tentang Sertifikat Ganda Di Desa Yeh Sumbul, Kecamatan Mendoyo, Kabupaten Jembrana.” Kertha Semaya 1, no. 2 (2013): 1–5.

Lubis, Diana. “Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Tidak Diketahui Keberadaan Pemiliknya.” Recital Review 3, no. 1 (2021): 105–119.

Mamudji, Soerjono Soekanto & Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.

Mursalim, Suryani Muhammad Akbal and Tika Nurjannah. “HAK ATAS TANAH ( Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar ).” Jurnal Supremasi XI, no. 1 (2016): 47–61.

Nugraha, Joshua Paskah, Aris Prasetyo Kurniawan, Indriana Diani Putri, Ryan Kunto Wicaksono, and Tarisa Tarisa. “Penerapan Blockchain Untuk Pencegahan Sertipikat Tanah Ganda Di Kementerian Agraria Dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional.” Widya Bhumi 2, no. 2 (2022): 123–135.

Permadi, Iwan. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Tanah Bersertifikat Ganda Dengan Cara Itikad Baik Demi Kepastian Hukum.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 95, no. 2 (2016): 448–467.

Udiana, Anissa Aulia & I Made. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Sah Hak Atas Tanah Dengan Adanya Sertifikat Ganda Hak Atas Tanah.” Kertha Semaya?: Journal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (2017): 1–6.

Utama, Anshari. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Sertifikat Ganda Hak Atas Tanah Oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional Tapanuli Tengah.” Jurnal Civil Law USU 1, no. 6 (2019): 1–20.

Wibowo, Ferdian Setyo, Novita Listyaningrum, and Hery Zarkasyih. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Hal Terdapat Sertipikat Ganda Di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Lombok Timur.” Media Bina Ilmiah 14, no. 6 (2020): 2711–2726.

Zathira, Zahra. “Penyelesaian Terhadap Kasus Sertipikat Ganda Oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional (Studi Di Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kota Malang).” Jurnal Media Hukum & Peradilan 5, no. 2 (2019): 230–235.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-16

How to Cite

Soediro, S., Kartini, I. A., Faridli, E. M., & Nur’aeni, N. (2023). Double Certificates and Its Resolution in (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 976 K/PDT/2015). Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 14, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v14i.910

Most read articles by the same author(s)