Critical and Analytical Thinking about Controversial Issues in Digital Historical Sources

Authors

  • Intan Permana Sari
  • Ipong Jazimah

Keywords:

History, Controversial Issues, Critical Thinking, Analytical

Abstract

This article discusses the ability to think critically and analytically about controversial issues in digital historical sources. History writing in the digital era is growing with the existence of digital historical sources. Digitization allows for wider access to historical information that is rarely known or even recorded in print historical sources. Through digital historical sources, the digitization ability of people from various walks of life plays an important role in improving their critical and analytical thinking skills in studying controversial issues circulating in digital historical sources. The method used in compiling this article is the literature study method where researchers obtain reference sources from libraries and mobile libraries. Historians study a historical event using various historical sources such as printed, oral, and digital sources. Each of these types of historical sources has its level of credit worthiness. The use of digital historical sources is one of the important factors to help researchers write the narrative of a historical event. Therefore, in examining controversial issues circulating in digital history sources, the role of individuals from various circles is very important in criticizing and analyzing controversial issues that are widely circulated. Freedom in accessing information through digital allows researchers, academics, or the general public to know historical facts that are rarely known. As this study is a literature review, explicitly indicate the findings based on the reviewed literature, include identified themes based on the library research, write potential implications.

References

Adam, W. A. (2007). Pelurusan Sejarah Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Anis, M. Z. A., Mardiani, F., & Fathurrahman. (2022). Digital History dan Kesiapan Belajar Sejarah di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Fajar Historia, 5(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29408/fhs.v6i1.4375

Gonggong, A. (n.d.). Kontroversi dan Dinamika Sejarah Indonesia: dari Dasar Negara, Serangan Umum sampai G30S . Jurnal Sejarah 10: Pemikiran, Rekonstruksi, Persepsi Diterbitkan Oleh Masyarakat Sejarawan Indonesia.

Harahap, N. (2014). Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jurnal Iqra’, 08(01), 68–73. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/196955-ID-penelitian-kepustakaan.pdf

Kochhar. (2008). Pembelajaran Sejarah “Teaching of History.” Jakarta: Grasindo.

Neolaka, A. (2019). Isu-isu Kritis Pendidikan Utama dan Tetap Penting Namun Terabaikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Priyadi, S. (2021). Metode Penelitian Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Purwanto, B. (2009). Sejarah, Kurikulum, dan Pembelajaran Kontroversial Sebuah Catatan Diskusi. . Surakarta.

Rahardhian, A. (2022). Kajian Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis (Critical Thinking Skill) dari Sudut Pandang Filsafat. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v5i2.42092

Sinaga, R., Pratama, D., Piliang, P. H., & Ningrum, D. M. (2024). Kemanusiaan dan Eksploitasi: Analisis Kebijakan Daendels di Tanah Jawa (1808-1811). AR RUMMAN - Journal of Education and Learning Evaluation, 1(2), 270–276. Retrieved from https://rayyanjurnal.com/index.php/ar-rumman/article/view/3982/3396

Syamsudin, H. (2000). Penulisan Buku Teks Sejarah: Kriteria dan Permasalahannya . Historia Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) Bandung, 1(1).

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

How to Cite

Sari, I. P., & Jazimah, I. (2026). Critical and Analytical Thinking about Controversial Issues in Digital Historical Sources. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humaniti, 31, 1–5. Retrieved from http://conferenceproceedings.ump.ac.id/pssh/article/view/2239

Similar Articles

<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)